Fees are fairer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's concessions on top-up fees make the objectors' arguments look even thinner. It is difficult to argue that less advantaged students will lose out when the grant is to be increased to £1,500, students will receive bigger maintenance loans and anyone with a debt after 25 years will have it written off. State money, therefore, is to be provided for the disadvantaged so that they do not suffer under the reforms. The funding mechanism for students in Britain has historically been regressive. Taxpayers' money has been used to fund degrees for the better-off so that they are in a position to benefit further. The dustman has been subsidising the education of putative merchant bankers. That anomaly needs to end.
The Government's concessions on top-up fees make the objectors' arguments look even thinner. It is difficult to argue that less advantaged students will lose out when the grant is to be increased to £1,500, students will receive bigger maintenance loans and anyone with a debt after 25 years will have it written off. State money, therefore, is to be provided for the disadvantaged so that they do not suffer under the reforms. The funding mechanism for students in Britain has historically been regressive. Taxpayers' money has been used to fund degrees for the better-off so that they are in a position to benefit further. The dustman has been subsidising the education of putative merchant bankers. That anomaly needs to end.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments