Universities 'struggling to compare prospective students'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.University admissions staff are struggling to compare students applying for courses, a study revealed today.
The wide range of qualifications offered by the hopeful applicants is confusing the people assessing their grades, according to the report.
Researchers for ACS International Schools, a group of three schools in the south of England, found almost half (48%) of admissions officers said the variety of qualifications being offered by prospective students was "the most difficult thing to deal with".
University staff are finding it difficult to compile a points system to make sure students that took certain exams are on a level playing field with those that took alternative ones, pollsters found.
Seven in 10 admissions officers agreed it was harder to achieve the top score of 45 in the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma, for example, than the equivalent three As at A level.
Fergus Rose, from ACS International Schools, said: "The ACS survey highlights the conundrum faced by university admissions officers when comparing qualifications.
"Clearly there needs to be wider understanding of why the IB is so highly rated by universities and greater emphasis given to ensuring a tariff comparison that reflects this.
"It is also clear, however, that this needs to be achieved without devaluing A levels which are also rated highly by admissions officers."
Nearly three quarters (72%) of those questioned said the new A star level is the solution to the problem of "grade inflation", and 53% of them agreed with the statement: "grade inflation makes it harder to identify the best candidates".
Only 5% believe it is now time to abandon A levels altogether and 15% said the quality or level of academic grades being offered by students was the most difficult issue.
The survey of 40 admissions officers from the UK and 20 from the US was carried out by an independent organisation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments