Cutting tuition fees could hurt poorer students, claims social mobility tsar
Martina Milburn said restoring maintenance grants would be more effective in widening access
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cutting tuition fees could prevent some young people from poorer backgrounds attending university, the government’s new social mobility tsar has warned.
Martina Milburn, the latest chair of the Social Mobility Commission, said she did not believe scrapping the much-criticised course fees was an effective way of widening access to higher education.
Recent reports have suggested a government-commissioned review of university education in England could recommend a reduction of maximum fees from £9,250 to £6,500.
But Ms Milburn suggested reducing or removing fees altogether could prove damaging. “Cutting fees will certainly help a certain sector. Whether it helps the right young people, I’m not convinced,” she told The Observer.
“There’s also evidence that if you remove tuition fees altogether, there would be a certain number of young people from particular backgrounds who wouldn’t be able to go to university at all – but if you restore something like the education maintenance allowance or a version of it, I think you would widen participation. That’s a personal view.”
The social mobility tsar suggested returning to a system of targeted maintenance grants would be a better way of helping students from low-income families.
“This is something I think we would definitely look at in the future – on whether you restore something like the maintenance grants, which seems to me much more important than cutting fees,” said Ms Milburn.
Philip Augar is leading a government review of post-18 education and is set to report early next year. The maximum amount universities would be allowed to charge could be cut by almost £3,000 a year, according to reports last month.
But one suggestion is that leading institutions could be allowed to raise fees for some subjects – such as science and medicine – to up to £13,500 a year.
A cap on tuition fees in England was controversially raised by the government following the Browne Review in 2010, with critics claiming it has made higher education unaffordable to many students.
Less than half of universities’ tuition fee income is spent on teaching, according to research released by the Higher Education Policy Institute last month.
Much of the rest of the income goes on other academic uses, such as maintaining teaching buildings, IT and library facilities.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments