Teachers helping pupils cheat at exams, say senior examiners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Senior examiners are warning that some teachers are colluding with their pupils to help them cheat in GCSE, GNVQ and A-level coursework, it emerged yesterday.
They voiced their complaints in reports on this summer's exams to two of the country's biggest exam boards, Edexcel and the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA).
The AQA warned last night that teachers found guilty of cheating could face disciplinary hearings or even prison. George Turnbull, the AQA's spokesman, said that as far as the exam board was concerned the teachers would be barred from marking or invigilating exams for two years.
The latest complaints came to light only two days after members of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference (HMC) called for a ban on coursework, complaining of "internet-inspired abuse".
In four chief examiners' reports on this summer's exams, concerns were raised that marking of coursework had either been over-generous or that teachers had been too helpful towards their students or had failed to spot pupils helping each other.
In a report on the AQA's sociology A-level, the chief examiner said: "In some candidates' work, there was evidence of copying large sections of the [model answers] given to teachers."
In another report for the AQA board on history GCSE, the chief examiner cautioned that "coursework needs to be the independent work of candidates".
Edexcel said of its GNVQ in intermediate and information technology that, in the case of a few schools and colleges, "the work of all candidates was similar".
A spokesman for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority said that students who had been caught out had been disqualified from the exam.
Mr Turnbull added that the ban could be extended to all subjects taken by the offending candidates.
He said: "If teachers are signing off work that they know not to be candidates' work, [but they] undertake that, to the best of their knowledge it is the candidates' work, I think the only name for that is cheating. To say the least, it's unprofessional. If it's not the candidate's work, the student will be disqualified - end of story."
At the HMC annual gathering in Dublin, Graham Able, the chairman and headmaster of Dulwich College, said coursework should be replaced with teachers' reports on how well pupils had done in class during "the work of the course". He said there had been cases of students taking their coursework home and copying their answers from the internet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments