Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Teachers becoming the worst cheaters in school exams

Invigilators accused of 'over-aiding' pupils in maths, English and science tests

Education Editor,Richard Garner
Wednesday 18 March 2009 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Teachers are coaching their 11-year-old pupils inside the exam hall to give the right answer during tests.

The most common allegation of malpractice during the maths, English and science tests was that invigilators "over-aided" pupils, a report by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority showed yesterday. While the overall number of complaints about cheating in tests for 11 and 14-year-olds had fallen, there was a 14 per cent increase in reported cases of cheating inside the exam hall for 11-year-olds (from 305 to 348).

Nearly one in five (18 per cent) of these related to an invigilator "over-aiding" pupils. Only 12 per cent involved pupils cheating themselves.

The exam watchdog, Ofqual, said there was "significant cause for concern" over the marking of English tests for 14-year-olds.

Nearly half the pupils had been awarded the wrong marks, with a discrepancy in the marks awarded in 44 per cent of the papers. The researchers pointed out that, unlike maths and science answers, English called on markers to make a subjective assessment.

Teachers' leaders have warned that their members are under increasing pressure to make sure their pupils do well in tests because of schools' desire for a good showing in government league tables listing primary school results.

The figures emerge in a series of reports published yesterday about the conduct of GCSE and A-level exams and national curriculum tests.

They show a six-fold increase in the number of national curriculum test papers referred back for remarking in the wake of last summer's marking fiasco which led to the results of thousands of pupils being delayed. Teachers and opposition MPs were quick to claim this showed a loss of confidence in the testing process.

The figures showed that English papers were most likely to be sent back, with 4,628 primary schools asking for more than 25,000 papers to be re-marked. More than 160,000 papers were sent back for 11 and 14-year-olds. At secondary level, 1,001 schools returned English tests for 11,217 pupils, while 684 asked for a group review of their results.

Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "The figures are appalling."

David Laws, the Liberal Democrats' education spokesman, said: "These shocking figures confirm the shambles of last year's Sats [national curriculum tests] caused massive concern about the quality of marking."

However, the watchdog concluded that marking of the tests was "at least as reliable as in previous years".

In a report on this year's GCSE and A-level exams, Ofqual said there were 3,826 proven allegations of cheating.

A charter for cheats: How it's done

In tests for 11-year-olds

* Teachers and test administrators giving too much help for children during the tests – 18 per cent of complaints.

* Pupils cribbing from each other during test – 12 per cent.

In GCSEs and A-levels

* Unauthorised material into exam room, e.g. calculators, personal stereos or mobile phones – 1,618 incidents.

* Copying from other candidates, collusion or plagiarism – 1,037.

* Disruptive behaviour in the exam room (including use of offensive language) – 476.

* Including inappropriate, offensive or obscene material in exam papers or coursework – 302.

* Obtaining, receiving or exchanging information related to an exam – 184.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in