Sweden's free schools model has 'limited impact'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Swedish model of schools championed by Education Secretary Michael Gove has not transformed the academic achievement of the country's pupils, a report suggests today.
The biggest beneficiaries tend to be students from highly educated families, rather those from low educated backgrounds, it says.
The paper, published in the latest edition of Research in Public Policy, reviews the evidence on so-called "free schools" in Sweden.
Under the Swedish system, different non-profit and for-profit organisations are able to set up and run schools funded with public money, but independent from Government control.
Mr Gove revealed details last week of plans to allow parents' groups, teachers, charities, and voluntary groups to set up and operate schools, which would be taxpayer-funded, and non-fee-paying, but independent from state control.
He has previously highlighted the Swedish model, as well as the charter schools system in the United States as examples of successful free schools policies.
The report's author Rebecca Allen, of the Institute of Education, found Sweden's experience of free schools is limited in predicting the impact of similar reforms in England.
It adds: "The evidence on the impact of the reforms suggests that, so far, Swedish pupils do not appear to be harmed by the competition from private schools, but the new schools have not yet transformed educational attainment in Sweden."
The report highlights evidence that shows a "moderately positive" impact of free schools on academic performance when pupils are 15 and 6, but adds: "The biggest beneficiaries are children from highly educated families; the impact on low educated families and immigrants is close to zero."
The report also cites evidence that says: "The researchers also find that the advantages that children educated in areas with free schools have by age 16 do not translate into greater educational success in later life."
The Tories argue free schools will give parents more choice, narrow the achievement gap between rich and poor youngsters and drive up standards across the system because of the element of competition it will create.
So far, more than 700 groups have expressed an interest in setting up a school, it was announced last week.
Rachel Wolf, director of the New Schools Network which helps groups to set up schools, said: "This research confirms that the Swedish system has brought improvements. However, their report does not examine the bigger and more important studies of charter schools in America.
"That research, including lottery studies at Harvard, Stanford and MIT, has shown that allowing properly-regulated new schools can bring dramatic improvements in school standards, especially for schools for poorer children in poor areas."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments