Schools should be held accountable for exam results of pupils they exclude, minister suggests
But Nick Gibb hit back at suggestions that excluded pupils were the 'forgotten children'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Schools should be held to account for the academic results of pupils they exclude, the schools minister has suggested.
Nick Gibb said that judging schools on the education outcomes of students they have moved on could help tackle the rising number of schoolchildren being excluded.
Official permanent exclusions have risen by 44 per cent since 2012/13. An average of 35 children are excluded from school every day in the UK.
Robert Halfon, chair of the education select committee, asked Mr Gibb whether schools should be held “at least partially accountable for the future outcomes of the pupils they exclude”.
Giving evidence to the inquiry into alternative provision, the schools minister replied: “I think there is a case for that.”
He added that the Department for Education’s review of school exclusions could consider it.
A review in 2012 to 2014 had looked into the idea and found that “there were fewer exclusions when you track back the results and the school was held accountable for those results," he said.
Former education secretary Nicky Morgan included the proposal in her education white paper in 2016 – but it was dropped when the whole document was abandoned.
Mr Gibb hit back at suggestions that the pupils who had been excluded from school were the “forgotten children” in the UK's education system, insisting that the Government had not neglected the most vulnerable students who face using alternative provision.
On the issues of exclusions, this needs to be put into perspective," he said. "Exclusions began to rise in 2014/15 having followed a period of decline. Even today both fixed-term exclusions and permanent exclusions are nowhere near the high they were 10 years ago.”
But there have been growing concerns about the children being removed through informal methods like “off-rolling” - where schools remove pupils in a bid to improve their exam results.
Research last month found that more than one in five teachers and senior leaders wrongly believe they can encourage parents to remove their children from school.
The study, by the National Foundation for Educational Research, found that some teachers (six per cent) wrongly think they can send pupils home to “cool off” – without recording it as an exclusion.
Some, also incorrectly, believe they can encourage parents to home educate and others think they can record pupils as “authorised absent” or “educated off-site” when the school had encouraged them not to come into school.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments