Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Primary reading and maths levels up in Sats tests

 

Tim Moynihan
Thursday 20 September 2012 06:01 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The proportion of 11-year-olds in England reaching the standard expected of them in reading and maths has risen by 3% and 4% respectively, official figures showed today.

The percentage of pupils achieving the expected level, level 4 or above, in the national curriculum or Sats reading tests increased from 84% last year to 87% this year, the Department for Education (DfE) said.

The number reaching the same level in the maths test rose from 80% to 84%.

Arrangements for the writing test have changed this year, meaning it is not comparable to previous years, but the overall figure for those who have reached level 4 in English - reading and writing - is regarded as 85%, the DfE said.

The proportion of pupils achieving above the expected level, level 5 or above, rose in the reading tests from 43% to 48%, and in maths from 35% to 39%.

In the reading tests, girls have historically performed better than boys, and this year 90% of girls and 84% of boys achieved level 4 or above.

Boys' improvement was more pronounced, up 3% over the previous year compared to an increase of 2% for girls.

In maths, there were similar levels of achievement for both boys and girls.

The arrangements for writing tests changed. This year, schools were no longer required to administer a writing test and submit it for external marking. As a result, measures based on teacher assessments were introduced for the first time.

This year's figures for English cannot be compared to the figures for English that were published in earlier years, which were based solely on tests.

Pupils are expected to make two levels of progress between Key Stage 1 and this stage, Key Stage 2. The proportion of pupils in state-funded schools making the expected progress was 89% in English, a figure not comparable with previous years, and 87% in maths, up from 83% last year.

The proportion of pupils achieving the expected level this year, based on teacher assessment of writing tests, was 81%. The equivalent figure in 2011, based on writing test results, was 75%.

A DfE spokesman said: "We are also able to contrast this with figures from a representative sample of pupils taking an externally marked writing test in 2012 for which 77% of pupils achieved the expected level. This suggests that there would have been a gap between test and teacher assessment outcomes for all pupils at national level.

"Some difference between test and teacher assessment results can be expected as the outcomes are measured in different ways. A teacher assessment is the teacher's judgment of a pupil's performance across the curriculum and the academic year, whereas the tests assess a sample of the curriculum for specific pupils on the day of the tests."

The spokesman added: "There is evidence to support a real increase in the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level this year. However, as no information on writing teacher assessment is available for previous years and the writing sample test results are not directly comparable to test arrangements in previous years, the evidence for a real increase in attainment in writing is less strong."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in