Primary pupils 'need specialist teachers'
Curriculum reform would raise standards, says report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Primary school pupils should have specialist teachers for subjects such as sport and music instead of having just one class teacher, a major review of primary schooling will recommend next month.
Sir Jim Rose, the former head of inspections at Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, believes the idea could be key to raising standards, particularly among older primary school pupils. Sir Jim was appointed by the Schools Secretary, Ed Balls, to lead a review of the curriculum. His report will be published in November.
He told MPs on the Commons Select Committee for Children, Schools and Families that he had reached the conclusion after seeing the impact primary school music teachers and PE teachers had on their subjects. "That's something confirmed time and time again by Ofsted – more specialist teachers," he added.
His idea echoes comments made by the former general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, David Hart, in an earlier speech on how the primary school curriculum should be reformed.
Sir Jim is also making it clear he believes Mr Balls should set up a separate inquiry to look at the national curriculum tests for 11-year-olds. The Government last week abolished tests for 14-year-olds but said those for11-year-olds were "here to stay".
Mr Balls' decision to retain them has provoked an outcry from teachers' leaders, with Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, warning in today's Education supplement of The Independent that he has provoked a "head-on collision" with primary school heads.
Primary heads argue that the tests – and accompanying league tables – have led to too much exam-focused teaching in primary schools as a result of a determination to do well in league tables.
As a result, pupils have become bored with the curriculum. Secondary heads also argue that because of the type of coaching, they do not give a true picture of a child's ability – and most have opted to retest the pupils on their entry to the secondary sector.
Sir Jim argued to the select committee that it might be time to revisit the idea of testing a sample of pupils – rather than a full-blown national test for all pupils – to check on standards, as happened before the introduction of the national curriculum.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments