Parents of disruptive pupils 'should forfeit benefit payments'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Parents of disruptive pupils should forfeit benefit payments, a teachers’ conference will be told next week.
Delegates at the Association of Teachers and Lecturers will be urged to back a plan to reduce child benefit payments to the parents of persistently disruptive pupils.
The motion also calls for them to be told to attend compulsory parenting classes to learn how to deal with their children’s “unsatisfactory behaviour”.
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the ATL, said some parents were neglecting their duty “to bring their child up so that they understand how they should behave in school, respecting authority and the right of other pupils in the class to learn”.
She insisted middle class parents were just as guilty as parents from poorer homes in failing to prepare their children for learning at school.
They often “bribed” their children with computers and TVs in their bedrooms which left them isolated in their own homes.
“Often it’s the well-off middle classes that buy off their own children through the computer and the TV, that then isolates them within the home – and then they’re surprised when thir child isn’t coming to school ready to learn.” Dr Bousted added.
“Many teachers feel they are working their socks off under an extremely rigid accountability framework to get children to learn but are not being supported by home.
“If you go into a pet shop you have to prove you’re able to take care of your dog before they sell you a puppy but there is no minimum standard for parents unless you are so awful the state takes your child away from you.”
Dr Bousted acknowledged that parts of the motion were “quite extreme” but said it was addressing real issues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments