Panels 'should lose power to reinstate expelled pupils'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Exclusion appeal panels should lose their power to order schools to take suspended or expelled pupils back into the classroom, teachers said yesterday.
The National Union of Teachers' annual conference in Harrogate voted overwhelmingly in favour of limiting their powers to recommending that schools should be asked to review their expulsions.
The move follows a number of cases in which teachers have refused to teach unruly pupils sent back to school, including one at Glynn Technology College in Surrey last autumn when two pupils who made death threats against teachers were reinstated. The two boys eventually left the school.
A report to the conference showed there had been 32 cases in the past year in which teachers had balloted on industrial action as a result of appeal panels vetoing exclusions. These included one youngster who had brought a pistol to school andseveral cases involved pupils who had assaulted teachers.
Doug McAvoy, the union's general secretary, said: "We want [the panels] to be in a position where they could ask the school to look again at its decision – and possibly identify the reasons why they should review it.''
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments