Ofsted chief hits back at criticism of inspections as she warns schools are gaming system to boost results
‘Grades are hollow if they don’t reflect a proper education underneath,’ Amanda Spielman says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Ofsted chief has hit back at criticism from school leaders over inspections, as she warns schools are gaming the system to boost exam results.
Amanda Spielman, chief inspector of Ofsted, has said schools are narrowing the curriculum to improve their league table positions rather than serving the best interests of pupils.
Some schools are requiring nearly all pupils to take an English for Speakers of Other Languages qualification despite being native English speakers, while another school forced all pupils to take sports science at GCSE even if they had no interest in the subject.
At the launch of her annual report, Ms Spielman said exam grades are “hollow” if pupils have not received a well-rounded education, adding that poor children are not helped by turning a “blind-eye” to schools that get good results but offer a narrow curriculum.
Ofsted’s new inspection regime, introduced in September, which focuses more on the quality of education on offer rather than exam results, has come under fire from school bosses.
An award-winning headteacher resigned last week after Ofsted inspectors graded the school as “requires improvement” despite improving its GCSE results.
The watchdog criticised Bramhall High School near Stockport for allowing pupils to start their GCSEs in Year 9 as they said it “restricted” learning.
Leaders of academy chains have also recently accused Ofsted of favouring middle-class children with its new inspection regime.
The chief executives of the Harris Federation and Outwood Grange are concerned that schools are being marked down for giving pupils three years to study for the exams rather than two as they say starting GCSE preparation earlier can help pupils on free school meals.
But in response to the criticism, Ms Spielman said: “We must not succumb to the seductive but wrong-headed logic that we are helping disadvantaged children by turning a blind eye to schools that are narrowing education, if they deliver acceptable grades at the end.
“Grades are hollow if they don't reflect a proper education underneath.”
Ofsted's annual report also raised concerns about science in primary schools.
The subject was removed from Sats tests taken at the end of primary school a decade ago.
This move may account for a slight fall in England's science results in international Pisa tests, which are taken by 15-year-olds around the world, the report will suggest.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments