Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw opposes radical reform

 

Alison Kershaw
Monday 16 July 2012 09:11 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Ofsted chief inspector is against radical reforms that would see less able pupils sit simpler qualifications or take papers later on, it was reported today.

Instead, the government should ensure that existing GCSEs are stretching for all students, according to Sir Michael Wilshaw,

In an interview with the Financial Times, he indicated that he is in favour of a single exam system for all teenagers.

"The examination system that we have has got to be ruthless and stretching all pupils," he said.

He told the newspaper that it is possible to do this "within the existing system."

His comments are at odds with proposals being considered by the government to overhaul England's exams.

Under plans leaked last month, GCSEs would be scrapped with pupils sitting "explicitly harder" O-level style exams in traditional academic subjects such as English, maths, history, modern languages and science.

It was suggested that less able pupils would take easier old-style CSE qualifications.

Education Secretary Michael Gove later said that he would like to see all students sit the O-level style exams at some point in their school career, with some taking them later than at age 16.

Asked directly by the Financial Times if he would support either of these proposals, Sir Michael said that he did not.

He appeared to suggest that pupils should be able to take an exam again if they did not get a good grade the first time.

"If a youngster gets a D or an E, we say that youngster is going to be very closely tracked.

"Come back and do it again... a good school... tracks the youngster through until they do achieve," he said.

Proposals to bring back O-level and CSE style exams were met with a wave of protest from teaching unions and education experts, as well as exposing deep divisions within the coalition.

Lib Dem sources suggested that they were "very, very hostile" to something that would create a two-tier system.

In a speech last month, Mr Gove then appeared to suggest that pupils could sit exams at different stages.

He said that over the next decade, he wants to see at least 80% of young people on course to get good passes in English, maths and science in rigorous exams.

"I think one of the most debilitating things in our entire education system has been the idea that you make judgments early in a child's career about what they're fit for," he said.

"And I think one of the things we need to do is to make sure that hopefully by the age of 16, but if not at 16 then at 17 or 18, that a child is equipped with the level of qualifications to make those choices themselves."

A Department for Education spokesman said: "We will be announcing our plans for exam reform in due course.

"But the current system already means that a large proportion of pupils take a version of the GCSE which means they are barred from getting anything higher than a C grade. We urgently need to raise standards for all pupils."

"GCSE is simply not up to that job anymore - as this month's report from the Commons Education Select Committee proved."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in