Ofqual head adds her voice to the growing concern over pace of Michael Gove’s education reforms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The head of the exams regulator Ofqual today added her voice to the growing concern over the timetable for implementing Education Secretary Michael Gove’s GCSE reforms.
Glenys Stacey, its chief executive, put her hand up when those present at the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference (HMC) in Belfast were asked for a show of hands from tose who were concerned about the timetable for introducing the Government’s new English Baccalaureate.
Her stance came the day after influential Conservative backbencher Graham Stuart, chairman of the Commons education select committee, had told the same conference that the proposals were “incoherent” and urged Mr Gove to stop taking his “urgency pills”.
Mr Gove wants pupils to start studying for the EBacc in English, maths and science in September 2015 and take the exam for the first time in the summer of 2017.
Addressing the conference, she added: “We will advise government on the timetable for change and we will say if it is not achievable.”
She said that Ofqual would also study proposals to reform exam boards by only allowing one board to take responsibility for each subject through a bidding system.
“We will say if the risk to standards and delivery are unacceptable,” she added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments