'No benefit for girls' in single-sex schools
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Placing girls in single-sex schools makes no real difference to their educational achievements, an exhaustive study of half a century of research has found.
Professor Alan Smithers, a schools expert at Buckingham University, said it was a myth that same-sex schools benefited either girls or boys, The Observer reports today.
The main reason for the better performance was that they were generally fee-paying or grammar schools, with pupils drawn from more privileged backgrounds.
His conclusions - which confound the widespread assumption that girls need a single-sex environment to prosper - are based on a detailed review of research from across the world into same-sex education.
That research "has not shown any dramatic or consistent advantages for single-sex education" for either gender, he said. There are now just over 400 single-sex state schools, down from nearly 2,500 in the 1960s.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments