MPs reject crackdown on 'home school' parents
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Government plan to crack down on parents who educate their children at home will be rejected today by MPs.
The all-party Education Select Committee will oppose the immediate introduction of a compulsory register for all parents. It also rejects plans for an annual inspection of their homes and the right for council officials to question home-educated children in private.
Their report, published today, is critical of the way a government review, headed by Graham Badman, former director of children's services in Kent, collected information that claimed children who were home educated were more likely to be placed on the child protection register.
In evidence to MPs, Mr Badman said they were twice as likely to come to social services' attention. However, his report also said it was impossible to know how many children were home educated – with estimates ranging from 45,000 to 150,000.
MPs will recommend a voluntary register to be tried for two years.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments