Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LETTER: talkback

Janet Lash
Wednesday 18 October 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Janet Lash

Madam: On Thursday we received a letter from the principal of my son's school informing us that next year there will be a cut of pounds 200,000 in the school's budget. On Friday, at the Conservative Party Conference, the Prime Minister, flanked by the Cabinet, announced a doubling of the assisted places to be offered to bright children to attend private schools.

Chesterton Community College, which my son attends, last year achieved a 44 per cent A-C GCSE pass rate (compared with 27 per cent nationally). Of the 200 Year 11 students, 54 per cent achieved five-plus A-C grades .This is not a selected intake. Chesterton has a significant number of statemented children, and its catchment area includes a large council estate. By any standards, it must be considered a highly successful school.

And yet, at a recent parent-teacher meeting, the principal reported that the ongoing redecoration had been put on hold because a choice had to be made between curriculum development and plant. A loss of four teachers is inevitable because of this year's cuts. Already over-extended teachers will have to teach even larger classes, with a consequent increase in non-contact time work as more books have to be marked and more assessments made.

The staff at my son's school are every bit as well qualified as those at the private schools in the city (Cambridge is full of highly qualified graduates with energy, ideas and dedication). The difference is that they have to teach classes of 30-plus, in inadequately funded schools, on overloaded timetables that leave no space for proper preparation or reflection.

In such circumstances pounds 200,000 - pounds 20 per pupil - makes a great deal of difference.It simply will not wash for the Government to pretend that it cares about education, to insist that class sizes do not matter, to state grandly that it is not plant that really matters but quality of teaching, and then to announce an increase in assisted places because "poor people should have choice, too".

Whatever the Prime Minister might think, the choice most people want is not to have what others haven't got. What I choose is an education system that offers the best to every child. I choose a properly funded state education system. And that is what this government is denying me.

JANET LASH,

Cambridge

If you have any comments on education, please write to the Education Editor, 'Independent', 1 Canada Square Canary Wharf, London E14 5DL, or send a fax to 0171-293 2056. Please include a daytime telephone number.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in