Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mrs Jennifer Chew
Madam: "Baseline" testing ("Testing times for five-year-olds", Education, 11 May) can be a good thing, but it needs to be reliable. At present, it seems that mistakes are possible.
I know of one child who was assessed, on Surrey's hour-long Year R screening, as "below average" or "well below average" on almost all counts. A 45- minute professional assessment by an educational psychologist showed that this child was of well above average intelligence. The case may be a one-off - but, on the other hand, it may not be.
Any testing at any age should be objective and fair. It should neither underestimate nor overestimate the beginner's potential, the older child's achievement, or the value added by the school. Something better than subjective assessment is needed.
Yours faithfully,
JENNIFER CHEW
Egham
Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments