Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: The Government is reading it right

Wednesday 08 June 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The launch of an independent review of the way children are taught to read is to be welcomed.

The launch of an independent review of the way children are taught to read is to be welcomed. The move signals a return to traditional methods of teaching reading. As such it is an embarrassing U-turn for the Government, which has spent months insisting that the mixture of methods advocated in its official strategy was the best way of getting children to read. However, ministers could not withstand the growing pressure from educationalists, combined with mounting research evidence in favour of phonics. This is a traditional method of teaching which teaches children to blend sounds together to make words: for example c-a-t makes cat. A change to this would mean that children would be taught all 44 sounds within the first 16 weeks of starting school.

Change is definitely needed. More than one in five 11-year-olds still fails to reach the expected standard in reading despite seven years of the Government's National Literacy Strategy. Earlier this year, a seven-year study of children in Clackmannanshire, Scotland, showed that pupils who were taught to read using synthetic phonics were three years ahead of their peers by the time they were 11. In April, the influential Commons Education Select Committee published a damning report condemning current literacy standards as "unacceptable".

The teaching of reading has always sparked passionate debate among experts, with each arguing that their method is the best; and, for decades, argument has raged between the advocates of traditional phonics and those who favour other approaches, such as "look and say", which requires children to recognise the shapes of words, and "real books" which depends on pupils reading by practice.

The National Literacy Strategy tried to steer a middle course by using a mixture of phonics, whole-word recognition and guessing words by their context. The announcement of the review - one of the most dramatic U-turns in education - is a cause for celebration. Children who do not learn to read properly at primary school find themselves at a disadvantage and are liable to become disaffected and unemployable. The review - and its recognition of the success of synthetic phonics - is an important step towards improving the life-chances of the one-in-five children at the bottom of the educational pile.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in