Leading article: Protocol can end poaching
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The ground-breaking protocol agreed last week between the Government and Commonwealth education ministers to cut down on the poaching of teachers from developing countries is welcome.
The ground-breaking protocol agreed last week between the Government and Commonwealth education ministers to cut down on the poaching of teachers from developing countries is welcome. Figures show that South Africa, a country that can ill afford to lose teaching staff as it attempts to provide universal education for its inhabitants, has suffered worst from poaching - with 1,492 South African teachers being granted work permits for the United Kingdom last year. Under the agreement, a nation that is being targeted for recruitment of teachers can flag up to the recruiting nation - usually the UK - that it will be in severe difficulties if it loses staff. It can also put a ring-fence around teachers in specific subject areas if it faces a shortage of staff there. If a private teaching agency continues to recruit after a subject has been ring-fenced or a moratorium has been announced, it stands to lose its "quality mark" - its guarantee to schools and local education authorities of ethical standards.
At the three-day conference to hammer out the agreement last week, Alan Johnson, the education minister with responsibility for international affairs, came under pressure for an outright ban on all agencies recruiting from developing countries. He resisted on the reasonable grounds that the Government cannot dictate to private companies how they go about their business.
There is another reason, however, to resist such a move, and one recognised by the protocol that was eventually agreed. This is that it can be beneficial for developing countries if their teachers gain experience of working abroad. As a result of the new agreement, such teachers will also receive training - possibly in the art of headship, at the National College for School Leadership - so they are ready to take on a more senior post when they go home.
Finally, it is worth noting that the conference took place at Stoke Rochford, the stately home in Lincolnshire which is the training centre of the National Union of Teachers. Indeed, it was the NUT that convened the conference. It is good to see the country's biggest teachers' union at the centre of attempts to bring about a wider understanding of different countries' education problems rather than shouting from the sidelines at the Government - and being blacklisted and cold-shouldered by ministers for its stance. Let us hope that a similar outbreak of rapprochement will occur over domestic issues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments