Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: No boycott and no bullying, please

Wednesday 31 May 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Setting in motion a boycott of a country's institutions is not a decision to be taken lightly and Israel is a very different country from apartheid South Africa. It is a democracy, for a start and, as Ronnie Fraser, delegate for Natfhe, the National Association of Teachers of Further and Higher Education, and chairman of the Academic Friends of Israel, said at last weekend's conference, academics at Israeli universities have not been silenced or sacked for criticising their government's policies towards the Palestinians. To that extent, therefore, we disagree with the motion passed at the Natfhe conference calling on all members to examine their consciences and consider whether to boycott both universities and their staff in Israel.

Several of the conference delegates complained about the ferocious e-mail campaign organised by Israeli academics and other pro-Israeli groups in an attempt to quash the motion. These were sent to union members once the motion became public. Leading officers of the union were accused of being anti-Semitic, written off as "scum" and subjected to veiled threats of violence.

Let us be clear: it is not anti-Semitic to oppose the policies of the Israeli government any more than it is anti-Christian to oppose the policies of Tony Blair. Natfhe members opposing the motion were critical of the treatment of the Palestinian people whose schools and homes have been destroyed by the Israelis. This Israeli e-mail campaign was counterproductive. Some delegates said they had been minded not to support the boycott - but later became determined that they would not be bullied by one side.

Let us remember that, when it passed the motion, Natfhe had only four days left before it merged with the Association of University Teachers to become the University and College Union. The motion will now have to be reappraised by the new union. And the AUT has history with this issue. Last year it approved a similar motion to the one that Natfhe passed last weekend but had to rescind it a few weeks later because of widespread opposition from its members to ending scientific, artistic and educational links established over many years with Israeli universities. History may well repeat itself again.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in