Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading article: More checks are needed on staff

Wednesday 21 June 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The report by Ofsted, the education standards watchdog, on how well schools are carrying out their responsibilities to vet staff has exposed an unwelcome complacency about the potential danger to children from paedophiles. Very few schools and local authorities, it seems, had kept any records of the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks that they had made on their staff. While Ofsted acknowledges it was probable that they had done the necessary checks, they had no way of confirming that the checks had been done. That is being rectified by the Education Secretary Alan Johnson's exhortation to them to keep clear and up-to-date records.

Far more worrying, though, is the lack of robust checks on overseas staff seeking to teach in schools and the lax regulations governing the regulation of teacher supply agencies. It is difficult to insist that a police force overseas carries out an adequate check on staff but - at the very least - schools and local authority employers should be seeking to get some kind of written guarantee that the employee concerned has no criminal record. On supply agencies, the position at the moment is that it is up to the school to insist that the supply agency vets staff it is sending to them - but very few head teachers know this. Mr Johnson has promised urgent guidelines to clarify this. It would seem that agencies should be legally required to carry out CRB checks on all their staff. The guidelines cannot come soon enough. Having said that, we would be loath to add to the hysteria surrounding the reporting of this issue in some national newspapers.

Our schools are not crawling with paedophiles who have used every trick in the book to gain access to children. We agree with Margaret Morrissey, the spokeswoman for the National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations, who says that there are thousands of schools where there is no problem. However, we also agree that if you are the parent of a child in the one school where a paedophile has slipped through the net that is of no comfort to you. Tighter checks and a legal obligation on supply agencies to vet staff are the way ahead. More draconian solutions, such as giving parents access to the names and addresses of all paedophiles, are not. They run the risk of the guilty going to ground or innocent people living at the same address being beaten up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in