Headteachers to consider strike action
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's biggest headteachers' union is poised to back strike action against the threat to their members' pensions in a move that could lead to the closure of thousands of schools.
Delegates to the National Association of Head Teachers' annual conference in Brighton will vote on an emergency motion which could lead to an unprecedented strike by heads.
Sunday's motion, put to an executive meeting of the NAHT held during the royal wedding yesterday, would give the union's leadership the power to protest over the Government's threat to teachers' pensions by any means they thought fit, up to and including strike action.
Two teachers' unions, the traditionally moderate Association of Teachers and Lecturers and the more militant National Union of Teachers, have already backed a ballot on industrial action at their Easter conferences.
They are planning their first strike (in the ATL's case the first national strike in its history) by the end of June, with further strikes in the autumn term.
Under the proposals for reform, teachers will have to pay an extra £100 a month into their pension fund – the figure for heads would be even higher. In addition, the retirement age would be raised to 68 and the pension would be fixed on average salary rather than final salary – again a move which would be more damaging for heads.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments