GCSE students lose fight to have exams re-graded
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Thousands of teenagers lost a fight to have their GCSE English results re-graded yesterday after the High Court rejected a claim that exam bosses had acted unlawfully in changing the C grade boundaries between January and June sittings last summer.
Lord Justice Elias ruled that the fault lay with the structure of the exam rather than any unlawful action by exams regulator Ofqual or the exam boards.
The decision was greeted with "bitter disappointment" by the alliance of headteachers, schools, local authorities, pupils and teachers' organisations who had jointly brought the legal challenge.
Their action stemmed from the decision of exam boards – under pressure from Ofqual – to raise grade boundaries for those sitting the exam in June after concern that January candidates had been treated too generously.
Lord Elias said in his judgement: "Whichever way it [Ofqual] chose to resolve the problem, there was going to be an element of unfairness. If it imposed the same standard in June as it had in January, this would be unjust to subsequent cohorts of students taking the units in subsequent years." He concluded that the structure of the qualification was the source of unfairness, "not any unlawful action".
Malcolm Trobe, deputy general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: "Thousands of young people had their exams unfairly downgraded last June in order to compensate for mistakes earlier in the year."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments