Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Games: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 19 September 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Reprints come and reprints go, but one of the most welcome is The Expert Game (Robert Hale, pounds 9.99). The original, of course, was written by the late Terence Reese, first published in 1958 and long regarded as a classic. After nearly 40 years all-round technique has improved and Barry Rigal has done a fine job in updating the original and adding new material.

Take this deal, featuring the American star Gail Greenberg in the East seat. The bidding by North-South was both descriptive and accurate when they stopped in Six Spades after having made it clear that they held all of the outside controls and had only stopped short of the grand slam because of the weakness in the trump suit.

West led a low heart against the slam and South's natural play would have been, after winning on the table, to lead and run 4J. It would not matter if this lost, for now the solitary remaining trump would fall under the ace and in this way declarer would cater for the possibility of East holding all three missing trumps.

Greenberg created a diversion. Diagnosing the situation accurately, she dropped !Q under the ace! It was just enough to sow a seed of doubt in declarer's mind: was it possible that !Q was a singleton and that a trump finesse, losing to a lone honour, would allow East to ruff the next heart lead?

Perhaps South's play does not stand up to close analysis, but she fell into Greenberg's trap and, when 4J from dummy brought the four from East, she went up with the ace, (hoping for a 2-1 break in the suit) and so ended by losing two trump tricks.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in