First fall in pupils gaining top GCSE passes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The percentage of pupils obtaining the GCSE benchmark of five A* to C passes including maths and English has fallen for the first time, an official breakdown of this summer’s results has revealed.
The rate has dropped from 59.2 per cent last year to 52.2 per cent in 2014 – potentially putting hundreds of schools at risk of being forced into becoming academies with their heads facing the sack because of poor performance.
Yesterday’s analysis is the first time the percentage of pupils reaching the benchmark has dropped since the measure was introduced under the last Labour government.
Ministers were at pains to point out that changes to the exam system – such as stripping out scores of vocational qualifications and reviewing exams to exclude coursework and concentrate on end-of-year tests – accounted for most of the decline.
However, even when account is taken of the effect of the changes, there is a still a one percentage point drop in the figures.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments