Failure of truancy crackdown results in tougher policies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Truancy rates have failed to come down despite a series of government measures aimed at tackling the problem, figures published yesterday showed.
Truancy rates have failed to come down despite a series of government measures aimed at tackling the problem, figures published yesterday showed.
The percentage of days lost to truancy in the 2001-02 academic year is exactly the same as the previous year's figure – 0.7 per cent – even though police launched truancy sweeps and a woman was jailed for failing to send two of her daughters to school.
In response, the Government will introduce a "fast-track" system under which parents are likely to be prosecuted within 12 weeks if they do not ensure their children attend regularly. The scheme – which will mean parents face fines of up to £2,500, parenting orders compelling them to accompany their children to school or even imprisonment – is to be tried out in six local education authorities next month. Most are likely to cover inner-city areas with high rates of truancy.
Stephen Twigg, an Education minister, said: "Children cannot learn if they are truanting from school. There is also the risk that truants then drift into crime, causing problems for their community and society in general." He said parents must accept "their share of responsibility" for attendance levels.
The announcement was backed by the promise of further truancy sweeps. This year, sweeps picked up 12,000 truants in four weeks, many of whom were in the company of their parents. In addition, Patricia Amos, a single parent from Oxfordshire who has five children, was sentenced to 60 days in prison for failing to ensure two teenage daughters attended school, despite two years of warnings.
The announcement received a mixed response from teachers' leaders. John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said it would "send a strong message to parents that they must ensure their children are at school".
Doug McAvoy, the National Union of Teachers' general secretary, said: "These sweeps must apply equally to Harrods as well as Woolworths. Any other approach would send a message that only pupils from certain areas are being targeted."
Eamonn O'Kane, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said the return of "refusenik" children would leave teachers facing "an increased incidence of pupil misbehaviour".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments