Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Failing schools plan 'is a sign of official panic'

Judith Judd,Education Editor
Wednesday 15 March 2000 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Teachers accused the Government of panic yesterday as ministers tried to rescue their faltering "Fresh Start" initiative on failing schools.

Five days after three superheads of fresh-start schools resigned, David Blunkett, the Secretary of State for Education, said around six of the worst failing schools would be replaced by new "city academies". Business, churches and voluntary groups would be invited to make substantial investments in each and to run them in partnership with the Government.

Government sources denied that the initiative was a response to the resignations. But Nigel de Gruchy, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said the announcement smacked of "a touch of panic".

He said: "[Downing Street] will not confront the brutal reality which is that these fresh-start schools need brilliant leadership, backed by the ability to deal with disruptive youngsters. New sponsors and fancy names will not change that." Business leaders say they welcome innovation but the project was too small to make much difference: they were interested in helping the vast majority of young people, not a tiny number.

This is the second government announcement about failing schools within a fortnight. Mr Blunkett earlier said any school which failed to meet new GCSE targets within three years faced a fresh start.

David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "The Government gives the impression that it is seeking solutions to highly complex problems with increasing desperation."

Chris Woodhead, the Chief Inspector of Schools, said he was considering sending inspectors into Islington Arts and Media College, north London, and the East Brighton College of media arts, fresh-start schools where heads have resigned. Inspectors are already in Firfield Community College, Newcastle, where the head has also resigned.

After giving evidence to the Commons education select committee, Mr Woodhead said: "We need to understand why it is that these three headteachers have left and learn lessons from that. Something is genuinely wrong and we need to understand it."

Conservatives pointed out that the city academies bore a remarkable resemblance to the city technology colleges that they established. These were supposed to be financed mainly by the private sector, but sufficient sponsorship failed to materialise and the programme was subsequently halted by the Treasury.

One failing school has been taken over by a private company. The Kings' Manor school in Guildford was set up by Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council.

Mr Blunkett told the Social Market Foundation: "Our Fresh Start policy... is beginning to have an impact. But in some of the most challenging areas, we believe a more radical approach is needed."

Margaret Murray, head of the learning and skills group at the Confederation of British Industry, said: "We are always interested in innovation but we are talking about such small numbers. The big thing for our members is making a difference for the vast majority of youngsters."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in