Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Education Opinion: Why Labour should open its mind to subsidising independent schools

Averil Burgess
Wednesday 22 May 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour has come a long way since abolition of the assisted places scheme was its aim; the announcement that places may be funded in independent schools for children of special musical ability would have been unthinkable a few years ago.

But why stop at musical ability? What of children with outstanding ability in modern languages, or general all-round academic giftedness? These too would benefit from assisted places in schools catering for their special talents. Dare we hope that Labour will have the courage to take the next logical step?

The assisted places scheme is quoted as costing pounds 101m a year, although this is a gross figure that does not take into account the cost were these pupils to be in state schools; the true per capita net cost to the state is "probably not more than a few hundred pounds", to quote Lord Henley in Hansard, 13 July, 1995.

This very modest subsidy is all the more effective because the funds are means-tested and therefore help gifted children whose parents could not afford to pay fees.

Opponents sometimes present the scheme as if it were a British peculiarity, but we lag far behind other European states in support to independent schools - even when we add the roughly pounds 40m which charitable status is worth.

German parents have a constitutional right to choose independent schools; most are subsidised up to two thirds of the cost per pupil in a state school, and parents can also claim allowances against tax.

In France, the state pays salaries at approved independent primary schools and a per-pupil subsidy in secondary schools. In both France and Germany, the proportion of secondary pupils attending independent schools is far higher than in Britain, about 13 per cent and 17 per cent, compared with less than 8 per cent here.

In Denmark, independent schools which reach standards comparable with their state counterparts receive, on average, 75 per cent of their operational expenditure.

In the Netherlands, where more than 70 per cent of children are educated in independent schools, all running and capital costs are subsidised, and some of the pupils' fees.

The Belgian government, with 65 per cent of the school population in independent schools, pays all salaries, a capitation-based subsidy for running costs, and grants for boarding, transport, buildings and equipment.

Sweden has recently introduced a scheme whereby all schools with an approved curriculum have the right to the same degree of public funding, and there are state per capita grants, worth 85 per cent of the average cost of state education in their municipality, made to independent schools. Subsidies on the scale of our European neighbours make the assisted places scheme look measly!

All these countries, and many others in Europe and worldwide, have built a different relationship between state-provided and independent education. Where independent schools, with all their variety, are a guaranteed and an integral part of the freedom of parental choice there is no class-based hostility. However, for independents, there is a downside. The price of being part of national choice may be less academic independence, less freedom to be distinctive, and financial vulnerability to government cuts. Any new relationship here would of course bring its conditions, but it is surely not in the interest of government of any colour to turn independents into clones of state schools.

Independent schools offer excellence and diversity, and bringing them into a fuller partnership in this country, while respecting the freedoms that have made them distinctive, can only enrich the national system. It remains sad that Labour is committed to abolition of the assisted places scheme, but we hope that alternative bridges may be found, and assisted places for musicians is certainly a start.

AVERIL BURGESS

The writer is chairman, Independent Schools Joint Council Public Affairs Committee.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in