Education: Letter - The fat's really in the fire
Our article last week on obesity among children, and the associated lack of physical exercise, provoked a wide response, as did the pieces on the future of lecturers, and the issue of benchmarking subjects
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I READ with interest the article by Emma Haughton ("Survival of the fattest", Education, 14 January) on the health of our schoolchildren. Although I agree that childhood obesity is a major public health issue, that schools may have an important role to play, and physical activity is key, I was surprised by some parts of the article. First, the Health Education Authority's "Young & Active?" project was not mentioned. As co-director of the academic part of this project, and senior editor of the book containing the evidence, I am confident that this provides us with the best picture of young people and physical activity, based on the available international evidence.
Second, from this extensive review, it was concluded that many children meet the adult criterion of 30 minutes of moderate intensity on most days of the week, but need to do more to prevent the decline in health being witnessed.
Third, the "victim-blaming" language used in the article is unhelpful. Young people are not "too lazy and gluttonous"; they are, like adults, affected by a social and physical environment that is unhelpful in encouraging greater physical activity. Indeed, the article states that we eat no more than we did some years ago.
My fourth point is to disagree with Professor Armstrong's conclusion that the mother is the key role model in the family. Evidence on modelling of physical activity in families is largely equivocal, and certainly there is no clear evidence in favour of either the mother or father; peer modelling influence is far greater.
Finally, the article gave the suggestion that active children make active adults. The data available does not show this at all clearly. This "tracking" of activity happens, a little, from childhood to youth, but the link is very weak indeed from youth to adulthood.
PROFESSOR STUART BIDDLE
Professor of Exercise & Sport Psychology
Loughborough University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments