Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Education Letter: Labour Pain

B. A. Wainewright
Wednesday 30 June 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

John Dunford seems to want it both ways ("New Labour, same labours", EDUCATION, 24 June). He complains about open enrolment, parental preference and league tables driving a market-based system - yet he refuses to consider whether these might be the explanation for the "extremely successful" state schools in the period. He then grumbles that teachers' best efforts are publicly criticised (where?) after complaining about Stephen Byers' naming and shaming the worst-performing schools.

On curriculum, he appears to grumble that the Government has concentrated efforts on primary schools while neglecting its stated intention to develop post-14 structures, yet he warns that "governments usually make mistakes when they try to legislate on too many issues at once".

He wants the Government to give up "annual appraisal linked to pay" and to create "a new career structure that rewards the best teachers very well".

However, Mr Dunford does not explain how to identify the "best teachers" or how their performance should be monitored.

Time for a switch, surely, to less negative responses.

B A WAINEWRIGHT

Pinner, Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in