Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cable launches graduate tax and targets 'disconnected' institutions

Lucy Hodges
Thursday 15 July 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Universities will face deep cuts in government spending, some will fail and students will have to pay more in fees, Vince Cable said yesterday in speech that called for radical change in higher education.

Speaking at South Bank University in London, the Business Secretary said that elite institutions like Oxford and Cambridge should not become disconnected from society and asked whether colleges should reserve places for a certain number of pupils from a wide range of schools.

Mr Cable outlined the case for further upheaval of student funding by floating the idea of a controversial new graduate tax – to be called "a contribution" – to replace tuition fees. By forcing a graduate tax onto the agenda, Cable is heading off a potential backbench rebellion by Lib Dem – and Labour – MPs hostile to top-up fees.

"It isn't a tax," Cable said. "I have discussed this with the Chancellor and the Prime Minister who are very happy to see this explored." But the move received a mixed reception. The Russell Group director general Wendy Piatt said: "We are particularly concerned that it would be many years before revenue from a graduate tax becomes available, so until then there would need to be a very major upfront investment by government – a very costly solution."

The Business Secretary said that universities must do better with less. The market should be opened up to new providers; two-year degree courses, as revealed in The Independent earlier this week, should be examined; and there should be more distance learning as well as more higher education in further education colleges; and more students should live at home and attend their local university. More emphasis was needed on good teaching, he said. "What we can't afford is a system in which everybody tries to do everything – badly and at high cost.

"We already know there are some universities that are struggling financially. We're going to have to devise a system in which some institutions can fail without damaging the students that are going through.

"It's a bit like the banks. They have to be allowed to fail. So do the universities. It's going to happen," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in