Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 15 May 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was quite a subtle defensive point and a lack of clear thinking that led West in the wrong direction. I am quite sure that it was because the winning play looked wrong that he went astray.

South opened 12, North responded 1#, and South rebid 1!. North raised to 3! and South went to 4!. West led 4J, dummy played low and, after some thought, East took his ace and returned the suit with the fall of the king clarifying the spade position for both defenders. It all looked routine, and declarer started with a heart to the queen, which held, and a second heart. He tried !10 from hand but West produced the jack and drew a third round of trumps with his ace. The defence had now reached a critical point and, hoping that his partner held a missing club honour, West switched to 23. No joy; the ten from dummy held the trick and declarer was able to claim.

It all passed off unnoticed as a routine result at the table, for a diamond switch would not have helped either - after one club ruff, the suit is established for declarer, but what about a third round of spades?

Assuming declarer has a 2-4-2-5 hand pattern - very likely from his failure to bid no-trumps - the winning defence (which does not require partner to hold anything in clubs) is to concede a ruff and discard with a third round of spades! If declarer ruffs in hand, he can establish but not reach his long club suit; if he ruffs on the table and discards a club from hand, West wins the fourth round of clubs for the setting trick.

East-West game; dealer South

North

4Q 5

!Q 8 6 4

#A K 7 6 3

210 5

West East

4J 10 9 6 4A 7 4 3 2

!A J 9 !5 2

#J 4 #Q 10 8 2

2J 9 7 3 28 4

South

4K 8

!K 10 7 3

#9 5

2A K Q 6 2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in