Anger over exam board's delay in regrading pupil
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Teachers' leaders have called for a review of A-level appeals procedures after it took almost a year for an Eton pupil to have an exam module marked up from "unclassified" to an A.
The verdict is one of two published this week that cast doubt over A-level marking procedures. David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, called for a quicker process to ensure pupils received "speedy justice".
The Eton sixth-former's unit had been marked by OCR, the board at the centre of the 2002 A-level grading debacle. Last summer thousands of sixth-formers had their papers regraded after concerns that examiners had marked them down to head off accusations that the exams were too easy.
In the wake of this fiasco, Eton College asked OCR to re-mark one module taken by one candidate that had been graded as unclassified. The paper was then awarded an E. The school was not satisfied and lodged an appeal with OCR, which the board rejected.
Eton then took its case to the Examinations Appeal Board, an independent body.
The EAB found in favour of Eton and the grade was raised to an A. This increased the candidate's overall history grade from a C to a B. The EAB said it was unhelpful if exam boards were seen to regard examiners as infallible.
In the second case a pupil from Bedford School, an independent boys' school charging up to £16,755 a year, was upgraded from a B to an A grade in A-level history after his school spent seven months challenging the marking of the same unit contested by Eton.
Mr Hart said schools should be allowed to appeal directly to an independent body. The EAB has no power to re-mark or re-grade papers, but merely checks that exam boards followed correct procedures.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments