A-levels to stay despite diploma plans, says Kelly
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The demise of A-levels as the major qualification for 18-year-olds was signalled for the first time by the Government yesterday.
Ruth Kelly, the Education Secretary, told a conference of headteachers in London that she hoped the majority of young people would be sitting the specialist diplomas being set up by ministers to run alongside A- levels in future.
However, she insisted that A-levels and GCSEs were here to stay as free-standing qualifications in their own right.
Her speech brought into the open a rift with her chief exams adviser, Dr Ken Boston, the chief executive of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, who told The Independent earlier this week that the diplomas, which cover vocational subjects, would become the main qualification and A-levels would go "out of the door". Their content would be subsumed into the new qualification.
Ms Kelly, speaking to a joint conference of the National Association of Head Teachers, Secondary Heads Association and the Association of Colleges, was robust in her defence of A-level exams.
"They are widely recognised and valued in the education world and beyond, nationally and internationally," she said.
However, she conceded that a second main reason for keeping the exams was public opinion. "As soon as anyone sets out to change GCSEs or A-levels, that will inevitably become the focus of public, media and political attention."
Ms Kelly also announced that plans to make A-levels harder would be introduced next year.
However, she insisted that the new specialist diplomas being brought in by the Government had to be of "world-class" standard.
Ministers are planning to introduce a series of 14 diplomas, which will cover vocational areas but will include A-level. For instance, an engineering diploma will include a vocational qualification in engineering and a maths A-level.
John Dunford, the general secretary of SHA, said it was unlikely most pupils would study the diploma if A-levels remained.
"That won't happen," he said. "While A-levels are put on a pedestal - as they have been by the Government - then a large number of young people will want to do them. They will be the access to the more prestigious universities."
LEADING ARTICLE, PAGE 32
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments