Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A-levels fiasco could delay school reforms

Education Editor,Richard Garner
Saturday 05 October 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Crucial government reforms to secondary education could be delayed as a result of the A-level marking fiasco.

Crucial government reforms to secondary education could be delayed as a result of the A-level marking fiasco.

Ministers have been consulting on proposals for a shake-up of education for 14- to 19-year-olds since the beginning of the year. But senior officials at the Department for Education and Skills now say it is likely they will want to consider the second stage of the Tomlinson inquiry into this year's A-level grades before deciding on the future of post-16 schooling.

John Dunford, the general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said: "The lessons of the last few weeks are that it is better to get it right than do it quickly." He was speaking as examiners prepared to start regrading checks on more than 90,000 A-level scripts tomorrow.

The scale of the crisis has highlighted deep divisions at the heart of the Oxford Cambridge and RSA board. In 74 exam units covering 18 subjects, chief examiners disagreed with the grade boundaries set by Dr Ron McLone, OCR's chief executive. Headteachers' organisations have said many schools may switch boards as a result.

The saga has reinforced ministers' desire to adopt a two-tiered approach to reform. The first stage, which could be announced quickly, would be to reform the key stage four of the national curriculum – studied by 14- to 16-year-olds. Controversially, some subjects, such as modern foreign languages, would be declared voluntary, although ministers plan to make languages more widely available in primary schools.

The drive towards more vocational GCSEs in subjects as diverse as engineering and health care will also be confirmed, with more 14-year-olds being allowed to study at college instead of school. But plans for a new matriculation diploma for all 19-year-olds will be rethought as part of the second stage of the reforms.

Mike Tomlinson, the former chief schools inspector heading the independent inquiry into A-levels, will rule in November on the fate of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, the Government's exams watchdog, and on whether the standards of the post-16 new examination system (of AS-levels followed by A2 units) match those of the old A-levels.

Meanwhile, examiners will tomorrow begin checking the grades of 91,545 candidates who sat OCR exams, 29 per cent of the total. Regrading checks being carried out by other boards are minimal, however, with Edexcel saying just 164 students sitting French and Spanish exams are affected. The third board, the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance, is confident its grade awards will stand.

Teachers' leaders have described the final figures for regrading checks as "far greater than most parents, teachers and students imagined possible". If the checks lead to grades being increased, it could cause chaos for university admissions.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in