Education: Ballot on future of grammar schools rigged, say Tories
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GOVERNMENT PLANS to hold ballots on Britain's remaining grammar schools would "rig" the vote in favour of abolition, Tory MPs claimed yesterday.
The shadow Schools Minister, Damien Green, led an opposition onslaught on the proposals during a heated debate in the Commons. He claimed that it was unfair on parents that the question on ballot papers would not include the phrase "grammar school".
But the Schools Minister, Estelle Morris, told the Fifth Standing Committee on Education (Grammar School Ballots) Regulations 1998, that all ballots would be unambiguous.
MPs approved the new regulations, effectively handing the decision on the future of the 166 remaining grammar schools to local parents. Under the rules, 20 per cent of parents must sign a petition to trigger a ballot on the future status of a selective school.
However, the Tories claimed that it was misleading to ask parents if they were in favour of "all the schools listed introducing admission arrangements which admit children of all abilities". Mr Green said many parents would not realise the implications of a vote.
Phil Willis, a Liberal Democrat education spokesman, also criticised the detailed rules, branding them a "dog's dinner".
Graham Lane, the education chairman of the Local Government Association, said the system was broadly fair. Tory attacks on the proposals were "the rantings of people living in the 1920s", he said.
There have already been complaints from anti-selection campaigners that the rules favour some grammar schools. In some areas with scattered remaining grammar schools, only parents at "feeder" primary schools would have a vote.
It was also claimed yesterday the campaign to abolish the last grammar schools has been taken up by parents in almost half the local authorities which still run selective schools. The Campaign for State Education said it had received expressions of interest from parents in 14 of the 36 authorities which still have grammar schools.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments