Early return is a distant hope for most refugees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EVEN IF the details of a peacekeeping force for Kosovo can be rapidly agreed, many if not most of the refugees will spend the winter in Albania and Macedonia, US officials said yesterday.
As the size and complexity of the operation became clearer, it was evident that there will not be enough time to get everyone home before the weather once more turns for the worse.
The peacekeeping force will include 44,000 Nato troops - including 12,000 Britons, 7,000 Americans and 6,500 French - as well as 4,000 non-Nato soldiers from other European nations. There is no indication if, where, or in what strength the Russians would participate.
Until the Serbs withdraw, nothing will happen. There was no withdrawal under way yesterday. Fighting was still taking place in several areas between Serbs and the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). Some Nato nations want a UN Security Council resolution before they deploy, and a meeting of G8 ministers will take place later this week to prepare it.
The first stage of a peacekeeping operation would be for Serbian forces to withdraw in stages over seven days, starting from the south-west of Kosovo, moving up to the north. Enabling forces of the Nato nations would replace them as they left. "As they withdraw, Nato will come in and fill in behind them," said Ken Bacon, the Pentagon spokesman. This will be a highly complex job to choreograph.
The British and French (who are in the central and western sectors) would go in first. Highly mobile, lightly armed forces - the Parachute Regiment for Britain and the Marines for the US - would be deployed initially.
The enabling forces will de-mine their sectors, then set up communications, military headquarters and command posts, clear important infrastructure like airports, roads and bridges and prepare for the arrival of larger, more heavily-armed forces, such as elements of the US 1st Infantry Division. It will be one or two months before the whole force is present. Then they can begin the task of repairing infrastructure and preparing for refugee return.
There are at least three problems for Nato. The first is the finding, housing and feeding of internally displaced people still in Kosovo. This alone will preclude bringing back the refugees from Macedonia and Albania, who are at least under cover.
Then there is the question of the local Serb minority population. The Pentagon's expectation is that most if not all would leave for Serbia. "Many Serbs may want to leave Kosovo," said Mr Bacon, who gave little indication that the US was concerned if this resulted in a further ethnic partition.
It is not clear how their safety will be ensured if they stay, because there is also the question of the KLA. They would be demilitarised but not disarmed. Mr Bacon said: "They will be allowed to keep hunting rifles and things like that." In practice it would be impossible to disarm them without a fight which Nato clearly does not want.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments