Earhart 'died on Pacific atoll'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MORE THAN 60 years after the pioneering aviator Amelia Earhart disappeared without trace over the Pacific on a round-the-world flight, American researchers believe they are close to cracking the mystery of where and how she died.
Armed with new evidence, The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (Tighar), based in Delaware, says Earhart and her navigator, Frederick J Noonan, almost certainly crashed on the atoll of Nikumaroro. They died either of thirst or starvation when rescue efforts failed to find them.
The group believes that key evidence in the case was dug up by the British colonial administration in the Western Pacific in 1940, three years after the crash, but was kept from public attention because of scientific incompetence and an insistence by the High Commission to keep the affair secret.
According to the Commission's files, the British administrator charged with governing Nikumaroro discovered fragments of shoes, a sextant box and some human bones, which made him think of Earhart.
Richard Gillespie of Tighar said: "Anything we discover is bound to be controversial. But just because we are criticised doesn't mean our evidence has been disproved."
What is still missing is conclusive proof. The most compelling piece of evidence would be the bones, but nobody knows where they are.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments