Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Duchess of York changes her name

Michael Leapman
Saturday 08 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ROSE growers have inflicted the most embarrassing indignity on the Duchess of York since the snatched topless holiday snaps: they have withdrawn her name from a variety after only two years. In the new season's catalogues, the showy red and yellow patio rose formerly listed as Duchess of York appears instead - with a smidgen of irony - as Sunseeker.

It is extremely rare for roses to be renamed, even when the people they honour are dead or forgotten. Ingrid Bergman, a sultry red hybrid tea, still flourishes. And who on earth was Madame A Carriere, immortalised in a white climber that graces thousands of gardens?

Whoever she was, it can be assumed she did not let herself be photographed on holiday with her financial adviser. For it was the furore surrounding those pictures that persuaded the growers to expunge the Duchess from their catalogues.

They were motivated not by concern for family values but by commercial reality. The rose, bred in Ulster by Pat Dixon and introduced in 1992, had become the third most popular patio rose in its first season, according to the Cants of Colchester annual rankings.

But when the revealing pictures were published in August 1992, sales slumped and in the 1993 rankings, out last week, it had lost its place in the top five.

Last spring Mr Dixon polled rose growers about a change. A narrow majority believed that a rose by almost any other name would sell more sweetly. Mr Dixon is upset that the news has come out.

'I admire her,' he said. 'She has had a hard time and deserves to be left in peace.'

Altogether it has been a poor year for royal roses. The apricot Princess Royal has dropped out of the top 10 hybrid teas. One consolation is that the red Royal William ('good stiff upright grower') creeps into the hybrid tea list at eight.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in