Drugs tsar warns on policy at work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's "drugs tsar" said yesterday that organisations should not automatically call in the police when employees were caught in possession of drugs at the workplace.
While there was a strong case for police involvement when hard drugs or drug dealing was involved, managers should use their discretion over small amounts of cannabis for personal consumption.
Welcoming a new initiative on drugs in the workplace by the Health and Safety Executive, former police chief Keith Hellawell, the country's first anti-drugs co-ordinator, said that employers should use their "conscience". It was important that managers did not over-react, that the rules should be "preventative not punitive" and that policies were drawn up in consultation with the police.
A sudden and random regime where employees were sacked for testing positive could have damaging consequences, he said. He also warned against "double standards" where managers introduced tough rules on drink and drug abuse, but took three-hour lunches and came back the "worse for wear".
Peter Graham, head of the HSE's health directorate, said that companies who espoused the "testing and sacking" approach should bear in mind the cost of recruiting and training replacements and the need to ensure that the test used was "irrefutable" if the case were taken to an industrial tribunal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments