Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dr Death verdict soon

Mary Dejevsky
Thursday 25 March 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE MURDER trial of the euthanasia campaigner Jack Kevorkian headed towards a conclusion yesterday after he declined to bring any defence witnesses and the court went directly to closing arguments. America's "Dr Death", who says he has helped more than 130 people to die, is charged with the premeditated murder last year of Thomas Youk, 52.

The doctor admits administering the fatal injection but denied yesterday that his intention was to kill. Responding to the prosecutor's charge that he clearly intended to kill Mr Youk, he said: "He can't know whether I had intent to kill. I know I did not."

Mr Youk was incapacitated from Lou Gehrig's disease and Dr Kevorkian has argued that his duty as a physician was to end his suffering.

Shortly before the trial opened in Pontiac, Michigan last Monday, Dr Kevorkian caused a stir by obtaining leave to defend himself but his unfamiliarity with legal technicalities has complicated his case.

The judge rejected his request to call witnesses to testify to Mr Youk's suffering, and he decided not to testify on his own account. Contrary to the pleas of the prosecution and Dr Kevorkian - who wanted a ruling on the legality of "mercy-killing" - the judge directed the jury to consider conviction on a lesser charge; second degree murder or manslaughter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in