Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Douglas family to challenge accidental death verdict

Friday 06 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The family of the black burglary suspect Wayne Douglas, whose death in police custody a year ago sparked widespread rioting, plan to challenge yesterday's inquest verdict that he died accidentally.

The Douglases' solicitor, Louise Christian, said last night she would seek a High Court judicial review of the verdict at Southwark Crown Court, south London.

It would be on the grounds that the presiding coroner Sir Montague Levine erred in law when he instructed the jury about the conditions necessary for a verdict of unlawful killing.

Ms Christian said: "The family are extremely disappointed at this verdict and on behalf of Lisa and Albert Douglas [sister and brother of Wayne], I would like to express that disappointment. There was no reason for him to die in Brixton police station."

She added: "Time and time again, people - particularly black people - are dying in police cells and no action is taken. We will be going to the High Court to challenge this verdict because the coroner erred in law."

The majority decision provoked a walkout by many of the former postman's 20 or so relatives and friends present in court.

It also prompted Sir Montague to make a series of recommendations regarding police training and procedures. The four-man, five-woman jury said that in their opinion Mr Douglas, 25, died from "left ventricular [heart]" failure.

They said this was caused by stress and exhaustion, as well as positional "asphyxia" - lying face down with hands cuffed behind him long enough to cause fatal breathing problems.

They linked their eight-to-one conclusion to a "chase, and series of restraints in the prone position face down as used by current police methods". The coroner said the effects of restraining a suspect, especially in the face-down position, needed more research and evaluation.

Restraint and its effects following periods of exhaustion and stress needed to be the subject of specific guidelines for all officers, who should have a booklet on the subject plus receive refresher courses.

Mr Douglas's brother Albert, 39, said he was bitterly disappointed, claiming his brother was suffocated. "That is what happened to him. That is how he died. He was suffocated in Brixton police station."

Mr Douglas's girlfriend Nadine Beckford, a 20-year-old student from Brixton who went out with him for three years, had said earlier that she was hoping for a "good verdict" - unlawful killing.

She said last night: "I'm surprised and unhappy about it. I don't know how they came to that verdict. Maybe one person got an idea and persuaded everyone to go with it."

The inquest heard that the events leading up to Mr Douglas's death in the early hours of 5 December last year began with a robbery at knifepoint of a couple in their home in Brixton, south-west London.

Within minutes, Mr Douglas, who answered the intruder's description, was challenged by police in a nearby street.

He produced an 8in kitchen knife, similar to one used in the burglary and a stop-start chase followed in which Mr Douglas, of Crystal Palace Park Road, Sydenham, south-east London, repeatedly lunged at the officers.

They finally cornered him, striking him three times with their long-handled batons to disarm him. He was then wrestled to the ground, handcuffed and carried to a police van.

Some residents spoke of officers pouncing on the man after he had voluntarily dropped the knife, and subjecting him to a prolonged beating as he screamed in agony.

Each of the three medical experts the inquest heard from said the grazes and bruises Mr Douglas suffered bore no relation to the eyewitnesses' graphic accounts. Furthermore, none of his physical injuries played any part in his death.

Two of the experts, both pathologists, went on to say that they had no doubt the various occasions when Mr Douglas was in a face-down position had an accumulative affect in weakening his otherwise normal heart and leading to his death.

Within 20 minutes of arriving at Brixton police station he was dead.

The death led to furious rioting in Brixton.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in