Doctors rewrite Hippocratic oath
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The British Medical Association has updated the Hippocratic Oath, the doctors' 2,500-year-old ethical code.
The new version, drawn up over the past year by the BMA for the World Medical Association, handles some of the more contentious issues of medical ethics. It says: "Where abortion is permitted, I agree that it should take place only within an ethical and legal framework."
On the subject of treating the terminally ill, it permits doctors to consider the quality of people's lives.
Doctors will swear to "recognise the special value of human life but I also know that the prolongation of human life is not the only aim of health care."
In both cases the new oath focuses on confidentiality and respect for patients.
The BMA has been campaigning for the past five years for a revision of the oath, gathering examples of ethical codes from around the world.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments