Doctors claim Woodward baby was strangled earlier
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE lawyers who represented the British au pair Louise Woodward in her Boston murder trial said yesterday they may seek to have her conviction overturned on the basis of new allegations about the death of baby Matthew Eappen.
On the respected television news magazine 60 Minutes, to be broadcast tonight, two California doctors say they believe the child, who died in February 1997 from brain trauma, was strangled up to 48 hours before being rushed to hospital from the home of Sunil and Deborah Eappen, where she worked.
Ms Woodward, who is interviewed on the programme, was finally allowed to leave the US last summer, but with a manslaughter conviction. These new claims that death was brought on by strangulation leave open the possibility another person could have been responsible.
"If we view this as serious evidence, we will seek to talk to the experts and see what they've got," said Harvey Silverglate, Ms Woodward's lawyer in Boston. "It's never too late to get a conviction overturned, but we're not at that point yet."
Martha Coakley, who led the prosecution, was scornful, however. "This child clearly died from blunt trauma to the head," she said. "There's no doubt... that we had the right verdict."
The two doctors, both from Children's Hospital in Los Angeles, apparently base their findings on evidence of bruising around Matthew's neck. Strangulation, they argue, would have led within about 48 hours to a traumatic swelling of the brain.
Laywers for the Eappens called the claim "preposterous". They insist the bruising was caused by efforts to resuscitate the child after admission to hospital.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments