Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dobson pledges fairness on health

Jeremy Laurance
Monday 19 May 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A drive to end inequalities in health and reintroduce fairness to a system that had lost sight of it will be at the centre of the Government's plan for improving the NHS, Frank Dobson, the Secretary of State for Health, said yesterday.

New hospitals, more clinical staff and a focus on the health problems of the disadvantaged were among eight pledges Mr Dobson made, adding: "If we succeed, we will be able to come up with the sound bite 'Vote Labour, live longer'."

However, giving his first public speech as secretary of state, Mr Dobson made it clear that delivering on Labour's pledge to dismantle the internal market would take years rather than months, to allow experiments with alternative arrangements to be tried and evaluated.

Ending "two-tierism" and the other aspects of the internal market would require a "two-stage rocket" with some immediate measures - common hospital waiting lists for patients of all GPs, both fund-holders and non-fund- holders, is one possibility - while others would take longer.

"I am sure most people in the NHS would want us to get on with it quickly, but I am also sure they would like us to get it right," Mr Dobson said.

Speaking to the Royal College of Nursing's annual conference in Harrogate, Mr Dobson announced an end to the unpopular system of local pay under which staff in each NHS trust negotiated a local addition to the national pay award.

The system, introduced three years ago and intended to make trusts sensitive to local market forces, was suspended last year because of criticism that it was unfair and unwieldy.

Local pay had failed, Mr Dobson said. To applause, he added: "It has proved unpopular and divisive. It has dissipated goodwill and negotiations have consumed effort vastly disproportionate to the minuscule sums involved."

Renewing his warning that there would be no large pay increases, he said work would begin immediately on devising a new national pay system "with appropriate local flexibility". But he refused to spell out what this might mean. The RCN said supplements such as London weighting and those already paid in certain shortage specialties could be extended.

In a speech that was long on symbolism but short on strategy - and rapturously received by his 1,500-strong audience - Mr Dobson declared war on the "gross inequalities in health" associated with poverty, unemployment and homelessness, a personal commitment he is known to share with Sir Kenneth Calman, the Government's Chief Medical Officer.

Every government department would be charged with contributing to improving the nation's health, he said. The release of proceeds from council house sales to build new homes, proposals to get 250,000 young people off the dole and to introduce a national minimum wage were the first steps. "We are committed to a root and branch attack on the things that systematically make our people ill," he said.

Evoking the spirit of an Aneurin Bevan, the NHS's founder, he said that the health service was important not only for the care it provided but also for the principle of fairness it embodied.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in