Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Did Eve make footprints in the sand 117,000 years ago?

Thursday 14 August 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Washington (Reuters) - A set of 117,000-year-old footprints found in South Africa is possible evidence of a woman who could be the common ancestor of all modern humans, the fossils' discoverers said yesterday.

Made by bare feet in wet sand after a rainstorm, the prints are an important clue to a period with a scarce fossil record: 100,000 to 300,000 years ago, when modern humans emerged.

"These were made by a person who looked anatomically just like us," said Lee Berger, a palaeoanthropologist who announced the discovery at a news conference at the National Geographic Society in Washington, where a fibreglass cast of the footprints was displayed.

Mr Berger and David Roberts, a South African geologist who found the fossils nearly two years ago, referred to the person who made the prints as "she", based on the small size of the feet, but acknowledged that it could have been a small man or a child.

If the prints were made by a female, she could be the anthropological "Eve", a hypothetical woman who lived in Africa between 100,000 and 300,000 years ago and carried a type of DNA that is passed on only through females.

Eve is thought to be the common ancestor of modern human, and while Mr Berger said it was highly questionable that the prints were hers, he also said they were made at the right time and place to fit her profile.

Mr Roberts, of the South African Council for Geoscience, found the footprints in the rocky shore of the Langebaan Lagoon, 60 miles (97km) north of Cape Town. The chances of them surviving to this day were "millions to one", he said. To last this long, the footprints had to be quickly covered after being made, possibly by blowing sand, then buried for a long time to be preserved in rock, then eroded to the point where hardened sediment from the ancient dunes could be chipped away to reveal them again.

What he first saw was a ridge in the rock along the lagoon that showed where the ancient sand had been pushed aside by the side of the woman's foot; the actual footprint was filled with sand.

Mr Roberts was looking for footprints in the area because he had already found fossilized tracks of carnivores and rock fragments that had been worked on by hominids.

Only three other sets of hominid footprints have been found in Africa, and two of these came from more than a million years ago, too early for modern humans. The third set were dated about 30,000 years ago, a blink in the course of human evolution, Mr Berger said.

The Langebaan footprints were dated by studying the surrounding sediments and noting the fluctuations in sea level in the area over time, Mr Roberts said. The line of footprints stretches away from the shore into what used to be ancient sand dunes which are now buried under rock. Mr Berger said scientists plan to uncover those additional footprints.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in