Defence deal 'compromised security'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A cut-price contract for the construction of a defence research base at Farnborough was attacked by Labour yesterday for breakdowns in security.
The party's defence spokesman, John Spellar, who is sponsored by the AEEU, said incidents had included the arrest of 19 illegal immigrants found working on the site, and the detection of workers making improper benefit claims.
Two Russians and 15 Poles were among the illegal immigrants detained following a tip-off. "People are able to wander freely around a highly sensitive site without being checked in any way. It is quite extraordinary at a time of increased terrorist tension," said Mr Spellar.
But a spokesman for the main contractor, Shepherd Construction, said a distinction had to be drawn between the security procedures for a construction site, and the stricter procedures that applied when the site was gradually handed over to the Defence Research Agency.
"The layman sees this site as a flagship for military and aviation research, but that is not the case. It only becomes high-security once it is handed over to the client. When that happens, I assure you, the security is very impressive indeed."
The spokesman said that, as usual, sub-contractors had been taken on and agencies had been used for the recruitment of labour. He added that it was the responsibility of the agencies to check workers' credentials. Pressed to say whether any action had been taken against the agency, he said: "We have decided not to take any further operatives from them."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments