Crime: Electronic tagging 'does not work'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The use of electronic tags to place offenders under "house arrest", trials of which are currently being extended by the Government, are deeply flawed, according to a report by a prison reform group.
Based on research from the United States, Canada and Sweden, the study claims that tagging cannot stop offenders breaching curfews or committing further crimes. They are also unlikely to reduce the jail population, and people wearing tags have been attacked by vigilante groups, says the Prison Reform Trust.
The critical report follows the Government's decision to double the area in which tags are on trial, in Greater Manchester, Reading and Norfolk, in an attempt to find an alternative to imprisonment.
The trust questions whether tagging is just an expensive political stunt.
Electronic Tagging: Viable Option or Expensive Diversion, pounds 3.50 from PRT, 15 Northburgh St, London EC1V OAH.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments