Crime Bill defeat in Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government is considering its response to a Lords defeat on the question of increased protection for magistrates against costs being awarded against them.
Peers voted by 80 to 72 to support demands led by the former law lord Lord Ackner during a debate on the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Bill.
The move follows a European Commission on Human Rights decision last year that the Dorset poll tax defaulter Stephen Benham should be compensated for "false imprisonment".
A decision by the European Court is expected within the two months, but fears have been expressed the precedent could make JPs personally liable for costs of up to pounds 40m. A Lord Chancellor's Department spokesman said the amendment affected criminal cases only.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments